Peking Dork

Monday, August 31

Taxpayers shouldn't pay for UAW's rich health care benefits

I'll say. Now of course, my health care benefits are sacrosanct.
Posted by pkd at Monday, August 31, 2009
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2016 (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2015 (20)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2014 (15)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2013 (25)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (11)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2012 (168)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (23)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (35)
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2011 (48)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (8)
  • ►  2010 (170)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  November (25)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (20)
    • ►  June (14)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (21)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (33)
  • ▼  2009 (158)
    • ►  December (15)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (31)
    • ▼  August (31)
      • Department of Homeland Security
      • not neither=not either
      • How Obama Can Save Money
      • Would Tort Reform Lower Costs?
      • Taxpayers shouldn't pay for UAW's rich health care...
      • What unites Democrats and Republicans?
      • Good Novels?
      • The therapeutic ritual
      • Is Obama as bad as Bush?
      • The American Medical Association—a doctors' cartel
      • Republican "principles"
      • Not much DIY in China
      • Cash For Clunkers
      • Classical music online: newyorker.com
      • Whatever happened to Cindy Sheehan?
      • Old news but still true
      • What kind of rationing do we want?
      • Krugman-itis
      • Change?
      • Profit Margin: Health Insurance Industry Ranks #86
      • Obama doesn't really care about costs
      • Community organizing no longer good
      • Preventive care won't save money
      • France Fights Universal Care's High Cost
      • Obama Doesn't Like Community Organizing
      • Too much
      • Cash-for-clunkers didn't help me, either
      • Big surprise?
      • Sustainability
      • Sustainability
      • For California, Read Illinois
    • ►  July (26)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (15)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (13)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2008 (144)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (35)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (21)
    • ►  March (16)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2007 (257)
    • ►  December (15)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (25)
    • ►  June (37)
    • ►  May (30)
    • ►  April (14)
    • ►  March (38)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (23)
  • ►  2006 (347)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (26)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (33)
    • ►  July (52)
    • ►  June (31)
    • ►  May (22)
    • ►  April (26)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (51)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2005 (564)
    • ►  December (39)
    • ►  November (68)
    • ►  October (57)
    • ►  September (42)
    • ►  August (40)
    • ►  July (29)
    • ►  June (44)
    • ►  May (32)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (68)
    • ►  February (49)
    • ►  January (42)
  • ►  2004 (797)
    • ►  December (53)
    • ►  November (74)
    • ►  October (81)
    • ►  September (64)
    • ►  August (68)
    • ►  July (53)
    • ►  June (91)
    • ►  May (39)
    • ►  April (62)
    • ►  March (66)
    • ►  February (75)
    • ►  January (71)
  • ►  2003 (703)
    • ►  December (51)
    • ►  November (72)
    • ►  October (48)
    • ►  September (64)
    • ►  August (39)
    • ►  July (60)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (64)
    • ►  March (77)
    • ►  February (54)
    • ►  January (112)
  • ►  2002 (463)
    • ►  December (90)
    • ►  November (99)
    • ►  October (41)
    • ►  September (42)
    • ►  August (39)
    • ►  July (13)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (51)
    • ►  March (41)
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.