But they meddle in signs and banners in all sorts of ways, as we see from "Chino Hills News":
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3b4c/d3b4ccc0290045ff62a5876f45bd28c0615e7e5c" alt=""
Note what Joann Lombardo is quoted as saying:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/315fa/315fac1fc964dd2a09ce6ea42ba4203aade5cc18" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7545/e75450eaeff8b41bc1fe11d029299307eb9f1f5d" alt=""
Christophe's was the first restaurant to participate in the city's restaurant incentive program, which loaned the operators $350,000 in redevelopment money. However, the restaurant was unable to repay the loan, almost in its entirety, when it closed.And that's how Upland, CA threw away $350,000 of taxpayer dollars from the defunct Community Redevelopment Agency program. The government sure can pick winners!
The city retained the fixtures and furniture purchased with the loan, said Jeff Zwack, the city's development director.
Upland will never be reimbursed for the funding, since it was redevelopment money, he said.
What kind of return have taxpayers gotten for their coerced investment in the renewable energy sector over the last few years, e.g. in terms of business success, industry profits, and job creation? Not a very good return, and not very many jobs.(Even though they get much more in tax preferences.)