that the main beneficiaries of Wal-Mart's low-price policy are the poor, who could now afford products that would be out of their reach but not for Wal-Mart, improving their lives and raising their standard of living...but the program mentioned none of that. Perhaps it's the producer is one of those public-sector workers uninterested in growth.
...that Wal-Mart, all by itself, was responsible for a significant amount of the productivity miracle we have seen in this country over the last decade.
Monday, November 22
Frontline bias
An audio version of Is Wal-Mart good for America?. Bruce Bartlett (via Common Sense and Wonder) says he pointed out to the program's producer
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment