Robert Fulford's Humanities scholars spend lots of time reading, so why can't they write? cites some pomo-babble gems:

We can see a socio-sexual parallel between the geography of the wilderness and the topographies of narrative in this genre, which organizes a particular spatial itinerary and social anatomy.

It is the moment of non-construction, disclosing the absentation of actuality from the concept in part through its invitation to emphasize, in reading, the helplessness -- rather than the will to power -- of its fall into conceptuality.

Changing a brand of vodka

carries a metaphorical chain of deterritorialized signifiers, repackaged up and down a paradigmatic axis of associations.

He claims this, too, shall pass.